search

Kristina Paskauskas vs Eloise De Mooij Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paskauskas vs Mooij analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Kristina Paskauskas vs Eloise De Mooij Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Paskauskas 1 - 0 Mooij

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paskauskas has won 35.57% of points on their second serve, while Mooij has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paskauskas, in recent form, has won 50.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mooij has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.89% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Paskauskas has saved 42.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mooij has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Paskauskas has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Mooij winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Paskauskas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mooij has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 11/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16).
  • Player level: In the last year, Paskauskas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 5/ 4), where as Mooij has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paskauskas winning 1 times and Mooij being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paskauskas winning 2 and Mooij winning 0. The last match between Paskauskas and Mooij was at the W25 Roehampton, 17-07-2023, Q3, Hard with Kristina Paskauskas getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Paskauskas and Mooij have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paskauskas winning 0 times and Mooij 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paskauskas winning 0, and Mooij 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paskauskas has played against opponents with an average rank of 54.87 while Mooij has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paskauskas has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mooij has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Paskauskas has converted 64.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mooij has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Kristina Paskauskas

1

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

1

Minor

898

Rank

898

High

20

Age

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

N/A

Rank

High

21

Age

Plays

Eloise De Mooij

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L W L W W L W L W L

Form

W L W L L W L L W L

54% (42-36)

Career Total W/L

49% (21-22)

57% (4-3)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Kristina Paskauskas vs Eloise De Mooij For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Paskauskas VS Mooij

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Paskauskas VS Mooij H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Kristina Paskauskas Eloise De Mooij
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 6
Aces (Total) 3 2
DFs Total 3 4
Avg Match Time 1:27:0 1:27:0
1st Serve % 76% (44/58) 70% (43/61)
1st Serve Win% 77% (34/44) 53% (23/43)
2nd Serve Win% 36% (5/14) 44% (8/18)
BPs Won% (Total) 44% (4/9) 14% (1/7)
Return Points W% 49% (30/61) 33% (19/58)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Paskauskas VS Mooij H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-4
cross
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Eloise De Mooij
76% ( 44 of 58)
1st Serve %
70% ( 43 of 61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77% ( 34 of 44)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 23 of 43)
36% ( 5 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
33% ( 19 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 30 of 61)
69
Total Points Won
50

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Kristina Paskauskas Eloise De Mooij
YTD W/L 57% (4/3) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 57% (8/6) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 49% (61/63) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 57% (4/3) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.23 0
Aces Total 14 0
DFs per game 0.62 0
DFs Total 37 0
Avg Match Time 1:22:8 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 57% (200/349) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 66% (131/200) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 36% (53/149) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 65% (20/31) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 44% (153/345) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 57% (4/3) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 57% (4/7) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 50% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (4/4) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (4/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (3/0) 0% (0/0)

Kristina Paskauskas Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Samira De Stefano
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
67% ( 42 of 63)
1st Serve %
52% ( 32 of 62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
64% ( 27 of 42)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 21 of 32)
71% ( 15 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 12 of 30)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 21 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 29 of 62)
71
Total Points Won
54
L
7-6(5) 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Zhanel Rustemova
60% ( 27 of 45)
1st Serve %
51% ( 24 of 47)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
85% ( 23 of 27)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 13 of 24)
50% ( 9 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 9 of 23)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
29% ( 13 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 25 of 47)
57
Total Points Won
35
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Daria Frayman
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
72% ( 34 of 47)
1st Serve %
67% ( 35 of 52)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71% ( 24 of 34)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 19 of 35)
62% ( 8 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
18% ( 3 of 17)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
32% ( 15 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 30 of 52)
62
Total Points Won
37
L
6-1 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Vladislava Andreevskaya
53% ( 33 of 62)
1st Serve %
65% ( 42 of 65)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
67% ( 22 of 33)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 21 of 42)
34% ( 10 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
48% ( 30 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 37 of 65)
69
Total Points Won
58
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Ella Mcdonald
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve %
57% ( 27 of 47)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67% ( 22 of 33)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 13 of 27)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
37% ( 19 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 28 of 47)
60
Total Points Won
38
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Diana De Simone
57% ( 46 of 81)
1st Serve %
69% ( 50 of 72)
4
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
72% ( 33 of 46)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
37% ( 13 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
43% ( 35 of 81)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 36 of 72)
82
Total Points Won
71
W
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
Q2
W
6-4 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Mary Lewis
Player
Kristina Paskauskas
75% ( 73 of 97)
1st Serve %
69% ( 60 of 87)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
62% ( 45 of 73)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 30 of 60)
38% ( 9 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 9 of 27)
67% ( 8 of 12)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
44% ( 43 of 97)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 48 of 87)
102
Total Points Won
82
L
6-2 5-7 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Rachael Smith
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve %
56% ( 45 of 80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
92% ( 22 of 24)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 25 of 45)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 13 of 35)
29% ( 5 of 17)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
22% ( 8 of 36)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 42 of 80)
70
Total Points Won
46
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
Q1
L
5-7 6-3 10-8 H2H

Eloise De Mooij Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
QF
L
6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 H2H
Q2
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Humera Baharmus
Player
Eloise De Mooij
61% ( 44 of 72)
1st Serve %
70% ( 62 of 88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68% ( 30 of 44)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 39 of 62)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
23% ( 3 of 13)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
36% ( 26 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 36 of 88)
82
Total Points Won
78
L
7-5 4-6 10-7 H2H
QF
cross
Kristina Paskauskas
Player
Eloise De Mooij
76% ( 44 of 58)
1st Serve %
70% ( 43 of 61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77% ( 34 of 44)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 23 of 43)
36% ( 5 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 8 of 18)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
33% ( 19 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 30 of 61)
69
Total Points Won
50
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Eloise De Mooij
Player
Ida Johansson
65% ( 48 of 74)
1st Serve %
73% ( 47 of 64)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
77% ( 37 of 48)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 29 of 47)
65% ( 17 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 10 of 17)
33% ( 2 of 6)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
27% ( 20 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 25 of 64)
79
Total Points Won
59
W
7-6(2) 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Sue Yan Tan
Player
Eloise De Mooij
76% ( 59 of 78)
1st Serve %
65% ( 52 of 80)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
68% ( 40 of 59)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 31 of 52)
53% ( 10 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 13 of 28)
25% ( 3 of 12)
Break Points Won
13% ( 1 of 8)
36% ( 28 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 36 of 80)
86
Total Points Won
72
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Tamachan Momkoonthod
Player
Eloise De Mooij
74% ( 39 of 53)
1st Serve %
53% ( 21 of 40)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
67% ( 26 of 39)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 14 of 21)
71% ( 10 of 14)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 5 of 19)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
32% ( 17 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 21 of 40)
57
Total Points Won
36
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Eloise De Mooij
Player
Yatawee Chimchum
63% ( 50 of 80)
1st Serve %
51% ( 35 of 68)
5
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
9
72% ( 36 of 50)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 18 of 35)
27% ( 8 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
71% ( 5 of 7)
45% ( 36 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 35 of 68)
79
Total Points Won
69
W
6-3 7-6(6) H2H
R2
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Eloise De Mooij
Player
Sue Yan Tan
57% ( 58 of 102)
1st Serve %
66% ( 63 of 95)
9
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
69% ( 40 of 58)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 39 of 63)
52% ( 23 of 44)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 15 of 32)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
13% ( 2 of 15)
38% ( 39 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 41 of 95)
104
Total Points Won
93
W
5-7 6-1 6-3 H2H

Paskauskas Vs Mooij Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Paskauskas are available here and Mooij photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions